Turoe Stone Essay Checker

A megalith is a large stone that has been used to construct a structure or monument, either alone or together with other stones. The word "megalithic" describes structures made of such large stones without the use of mortar or concrete, representing periods of prehistory characterised by such constructions. For later periods, the term monolith, with an overlapping meaning, is more likely to be used.

The word "megalith" comes from the Ancient Greek "μέγας" (transl.mégas meaning "great") and "λίθος" (transl. líthos meaning "stone"). Megalith also denotes an item consisting of rock(s) hewn in definite shapes for special purposes.[1][2][3] It has been used to describe buildings built by people from many parts of the world living in many different periods. A variety of large stones are seen as megaliths, with the most widely known megaliths not being sepulchral.[4] The construction of these structures took place mainly in the Neolithic (though earlier Mesolithic examples are known) and continued into the Chalcolithic and Bronze Age.[5]

Early stone complexes in eastern Turkey[edit]

At a number of sites in eastern Turkey, large ceremonial complexes from the 9th millennium BC have been discovered.[6] They belong to the incipient phases of agriculture and animal husbandry. Large circular structures involving carved megalithic orthostats are a typical feature; e.g. at Nevalı Çori and Göbekli Tepe. Although these structures are the most ancient megalithic structures known so far, it is not clear that any of the European Megalithic traditions (see below) are actually derived from them.[7] At Göbekli Tepe, four stone circles have been excavated from an estimated 20. Some measure up to 30 metres across. As well as human figures, the stones carry a variety of carved reliefs depicting boars, foxes, lions, birds, snakes and scorpions.[8]

Middle Eastern megaliths[edit]

Dolmens and standing stones have been found in large areas of the Middle East starting at the Turkish border in the north of Syria close to Aleppo, southwards down to Yemen. They can be encountered in Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Israel, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia. The largest concentration can be found in southern Syria and along the Jordan Rift Valley, however they are being threatened with destruction. They date from the late Chalcolithic/Early Bronze Age.[9] Megaliths have also been found on Kharg Island and pirazmian in Iran, at Barda Balka in Iraq.

A semicircular arrangement of megaliths was found in Israel at Atlit Yam, a site that is now under the sea. It is a very early example, dating from the 7th millennium BC.[10]

The most concentrated occurrence of dolmens in particular is in a large area on both sides of the Jordan Rift Valley, with greater predominance on the eastern side. They occur first and foremost on the Golan Heights, the Hauran, and in Jordan, which probably has the largest concentration of dolmen in the Middle East. In Saudi Arabia, only very few dolmen have been identified so far in the Hejaz. They seem, however, to re-emerge in Yemen in small numbers, and thus could indicate a continuous tradition related to those of Somalia and Ethiopia.

The standing stone has a very ancient tradition in the Middle East, dating back from Mesopotamian times. Although not always 'megalithic' in the true sense, they occur throughout the Orient, and can reach 5 metres or more in some cases (such as Ader in Jordan). This phenomenon can also be traced through many passages from the Old Testament, such as those related to Jacob, the grandson of Abraham, who poured oil over a stone that he erected after his famous dream in which angels climbed to heaven (Genesis 28:10-22). Jacob is also described as putting up stones at other occasions, whereas Moses erected twelve pillars symbolizing the tribes of Israel. The tradition of venerating (standing) stones continued in Nabatean times and is reflected in, e.g., the Islamic rituals surrounding the Kaaba and nearby pillars. Related phenomena, such as cupholes, rock-cut tombs and circles also occur in the Middle East.

European megaliths[edit]

The most common type of megalithic construction in Europe is the portal tomb – a chamber consisting of upright stones (orthostats) with one or more large flat capstones forming a roof. Many of these, though by no means all, contain human remains, but it is debatable whether use as burial sites was their primary function. The megalithic structures of Malta are believed to be the oldest in Europe, in particular Skorba Temples. Though generally known as dolmens, the correct term accepted by archaeologists is portal tomb. However many local names exist, such as anta in Galicia and Portugal, stazzone in Sardinia, hunebed in the Netherlands, Hünengrab in Germany, dysse in Denmark, and cromlech in Wales. It is assumed that most portal tombs were originally covered by earthen mounds.

The second-most-common tomb type is the passage grave. It normally consists of a square, circular, or cruciform chamber with a slabbed or corbelled roof, accessed by a long, straight passageway, with the whole structure covered by a circular mound of earth. Sometimes it is also surrounded by an external stone kerb. Prominent examples include the sites of Brú na Bóinne and Carrowmore in Ireland, Maes Howe in Orkney, and Gavrinis in France.

The third tomb type is a diverse group known as gallery graves. These are axially arranged chambers placed under elongated mounds. The Irish court tombs, British long barrows, and German Steinkisten belong to this group.

Another type of megalithic monument, the single standing stone, or menhir as it is known in France, is very common throughout Europe, where some 50,000 examples have been noted. Some of these are thought to have an astronomical function as a marker or foresight. In some areas, long and complex alignments of such stones exist, the largest known example being located at Carnac in Brittany, France.

In parts of Britain and Ireland a relatively common type of megalithic construction is the stone circle, of which examples include Stonehenge, Avebury, Ring of Brodgar and Beltany. These, too, display evidence of astronomical alignments, both solar and lunar. Stonehenge, for example, is famous for its solstice alignment. Examples of stone circles are also found in the rest of Europe. The circle at Lough Gur, near Limerick in Ireland has been dated to the Beaker period, approximately contemporaneous with Stonehenge. The stone circles are assumed to be of later date than the tombs, straddling the Neolithic and the Bronze Ages.


Megalithic tombs are aboveground burial chambers, built of large stone slabs (megaliths) laid on edge and covered with earth or other, smaller stones. They are a type of chamber tomb, and the term is used to describe the structures built across Atlantic Europe, the Mediterranean, and neighbouring regions, mostly during the Neolithic period, by Neolithic farming communities. They differ from the contemporary long barrows through their structural use of stone.

There is a huge variety of megalithic tombs. The free-standing single chamber dolmens and portal dolmens found in Brittany, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Sweden, Wales, and elsewhere consist of a large flat stone supported by three, four, or more standing stones. They were covered by a stone cairn or earth barrow.

In Italy, dolmens can be found especially in Sardinia. There are more than 100 dolmen dating to the Neolithic (3500–2700 BC) and the most famous is called Dolmen di Sa Coveccada (near Mores ). During the Bronze Age, the Nuragic civilization built c. 800 Giants' grave, a type of megalithic gallery grave that can be found throughout Sardinia with different structures. The earliest megalithic tombs in Sardinia are the circular graves of the so-called Arzachena culture, also found in Corsica, southern France and eastern Spain.

Dolmen are also in Apulia and in Sicily. In this latter region, they are small structures located in Mura Pregne (Palermo), Sciacca (Agrigento), Monte Bubbonia (Caltanissetta), Butera (Caltanissetta), Cava Lazzaro (Siracusa), Cava dei Servi (Ragusa), Avola (Siracusa), Argimusco in Montalbano Elicona (Messina). Dating to the early Bronze Age (2200–1800 BC), the prehistoric Sicilian buildings were covered by a circular mound of earth. In the dolmen of Cava dei Servi, the archaeologists found numerous human bone fragments and some splinters of Castelluccian ceramics (Early Bronze Age) which confirmed the burial purpose of the artefact.[11]

Examples with outer areas, not used for burial, are also known. The Court Cairns of southwest Scotland and northern Ireland, the Severn-Cotswold tombs of southwest England and the Transepted gallery graves of the Loire region in France share many internal features, although the links between them are not yet fully understood. That they often have antechambers or forecourts is thought to imply a desire on the part of the builders to emphasize a special ritual or physical separation of the dead from the living.

The Passage graves of Orkney, Ireland's Boyne Valley, and north Wales are even more complex and impressive, with cross-shaped arrangements of chambers and passages. The workmanship on the stone blocks at Maeshowe for example is unknown elsewhere in northwest Europe at the time.

Megalithic tombs appear to have been used by communities for the long-term deposition of the remains of their dead, and some seem to have undergone alteration and enlargement. The organization and effort required to erect these large stones suggest that the societies concerned placed great emphasis on the proper treatment of their dead. The ritual significance of the tombs is supported by the presence of megalithic art carved into the stones at some sites. Hearths and deposits of pottery and animal bone found by archaeologists around some tombs also implies that some form of burial feast or sacrificial rites took place there.

Further examples of megalithic tombs include the stalled cairn at Midhowe in Orkney and the passage grave at Bryn Celli Ddu on Anglesey. There are also extensive grave sites with up to 60 megaliths at Louisenlund and Gryet on the Danish island of Bornholm.[12] Despite its name, the Stone Tomb in Ukraine was not a tomb but rather a sanctuary.

Other structures[edit]

In association with the megalithic constructions across Europe, there are often large earthworks of various designs – ditches and banks (like the Dorset Cursus), broad terraces, circular enclosures known as henges, and frequently artificial mounds such as Silbury Hill in England and Monte d'Accoddi in Sardinia (the prehistoric step pyramid) . A lot of spirals are found through of Sardinia: the best known is Perda Pinta of Mamoiada.

It seems that spirals were an important motif for the megalith builders (see Megalithic Temples of Malta). They have been found carved into megalithic structures all over Europe, along with other symbols such as lozenges, eye-patterns, zigzags in various configurations, and cup and ring marks. While not a written script in the modern sense of the term, these symbols are considered to have conveyed meaning to their creators, and are remarkably consistent across the whole of Europe.

Spread of megalithic architecture in Europe[edit]

In Europe megaliths are, in general, constructions erected during the Neolithic or late stone age and Chalcolithic or Copper Age (4500–1500 BC). The megalithic structures of Malta are believed to be the oldest in Europe. Perhaps the most famous megalithic structure is Stonehenge in England. In Sardinia, in addition to dolmens, menhirs and circular graves there are also more than 8000 megalithic structure made by a Nuragic civilisation, called Nuraghe: buildings similar to towers (sometimes with really complex structures) made using only rocks. They are often near giant's grave or the other megalithic monuments.

The French Comte de Caylus was the first to describe the Carnac stones. Pierre Jean-Baptiste Legrand d'Aussy introduced the terms menhir and dolmen, both taken from the Breton language, into antiquarian terminology. He mistakenly interpreted megaliths as gallic tombs. In Britain, the antiquariansAubrey and Stukeley conducted early research into megaliths. In 1805, Jacques Cambry published a book called Monuments celtiques, ou recherches sur le culte des Pierres, précédées d'une notice sur les Celtes et sur les Druides, et suivies d'Etymologie celtiques, where he proposed a Celtic stone cult. This completely unfounded connection between druids and megaliths has haunted the public imagination ever since.[citation needed] In Belgium, there are the Wéris megaliths at Wéris, a little town situated in the Ardennes. In the Netherlands, megalithic structures can be found in the northeast of the country, mostly in the province of Drenthe. Knowth is a passage grave of the Brú na Bóinne neolithic complex in Ireland, dating from c. 3500–3000 BC. It contains more than a third of the total number of examples of megalithic art in all Europe, with over 200 decorated stones found during excavations.

Timeline of megalithic construction[edit]


  • c. 9500 BC: Construction in Asia Minor (Göbekli Tepe); from proto-Hattian or else a yet-to-be-discovered culture (the oldest religious structure in the world).
  • Submerged by around 9350 ± 200 yr B.P: a 12m long monolith probably weighing around 15000 kg found 40m under water in the Strait of Sicily south-west of Sicily whose function is unknown.[13]
  • c. 9097 ± 445 yr B.P: Quinta da Queimada Menir in western Algarve (Portugal); "a very early period of megalithic activity in the Algarve, older than in the rest of Europe and in parallel, to some extent, with the famous Anatolian site of Göbekli Tepe (Schmidt 2001)"[14]


  • c. 7000 BC: Construction in proto-Canaanite Israel (Atlit Yam).
  • c. 6000 BC: Constructions in Portugal (Almendres Cromlech, Évora)
  • c. 5000 BC: Emergence of the Atlantic Neolithic period, the age of agriculture along the western shores of Europe during the sixth millennium BC pottery culture of La Almagra, Spain near by, perhaps precedent from Africa.
  • c. 4850 BC: Constructions in Malta (Skorba temples).
  • c. 4800 BC: Constructions in Brittany (Barnenez) and Poitou (Bougon).
  • c. 4500 BC: Constructions in south Egypt (Nabta Playa).
  • c. 4000 BC: Constructions in Brittany (Carnac), Portugal (Great Dolmen of Zambujeiro, Évora), France (central and southern), Corsica, Spain (Galicia), England and Wales, Constructions in Andalusia, Spain (Villa Martín, Cádiz), Construction in proto-Canaanite Israel c. 4000~3000 BC: Constructions in the rest of the proto-Canaanite Levant, e.g. Rujm el-Hiri and dolmens.
  • c. 3700 BC: Constructions in Ireland (Knockiveagh and elsewhere).
  • c. 3600 BC: Constructions in England (Maumbury Rings and Godmanchester), and Malta (Ġgantija and Mnajdra temples).
  • c. 3500 BC: Constructions in Spain (Málaga and Guadiana), Ireland (south-west), France (Arles and the north), Malta (and elsewhere in the Mediterranean), Belgium (north-east), and Germany (central and south-west).
  • c. 3400 BC: Constructions in Sardinia (circular graves), Ireland (Newgrange), Netherlands (north-east), Germany (northern and central) Sweden and Denmark.
  • c. 3300 BC: Constructions in France (Carnac stones)
  • c. 3200 BC: Constructions in Malta (Ħaġar Qim and Tarxien).
  • c. 3100 BC: Constructions in Russia (Dolmens of North Caucasus)
  • c. 3000 BC: Constructions in Sardinia (earliest construction phase of the prehistoric altar of Monte d'Accoddi), France (Saumur, Dordogne, Languedoc, Biscay, and the Mediterranean coast), Spain (Los Millares), Sicily, Belgium (Ardennes), and Orkney, as well as the first henges (circular earthworks) in Britain.


  • c. 2500 BC: Constructions in Brittany (Le Menec, Kermario and elsewhere), Italy (Otranto), Sardinia, and Scotland (northeast), plus the climax of the megalithic Bell-beaker culture in Iberia, Germany, and the British Isles (stone circle at Stonehenge). With the bell-beakers, the Neolithic period gave way to the Chalcolithic, the age of copper.
  • c. 2400 BC: The Bell-beaker culture was dominant in Britain, and hundreds of smaller stone circles were built in the British Isles at this time.

Bronze Age[edit]

African megaliths[edit]

Nabta Playa at the southwest corner of the western Egyptian desert was once a large lake in the Nubian Desert, located 500 miles south of modern-day Cairo.[15] By the 5th millennium BC, the peoples in Nabta Playa had fashioned an astronomical device that accurately marks the summer solstice.[16] Findings indicate that the region was occupied only seasonally, likely only in the summer when the local lake filled with water for grazing cattle.[17] There are other megalithic stone circles in the southwestern desert.

Namoratunga, a group of megaliths dated 300 BCE, was used by Cushitic-speaking people as an alignment with star systems tuned to a lunar calendar of 354 days. This discovery was made by B. N. Lynch and L. H. Robins of Michigan State University.[18]

Additionally, Tiya in central Ethiopia has a number old megaliths. Some of these ancient structures feature engravings, and the area is a World Heritage Site. Megaliths are also found within the Valley of Marvels in the East Hararghe area.

Asian megaliths[edit]

Megalithic burials are found in Northeast and Southeast Asia. They are found mainly in the Korean Peninsula. They are also found in the Liaoning, Shandong, and Zhejiang in China, the East Coast of Taiwan, Kyūshū and Shikoku in Japan, Đồng Nai Province in Vietnam and South Asia. Some living megalithic traditions are found on the island of Sumba and Nias in Indonesia. The greatest concentration of megalithic burials is in Korea. Archaeologists estimate that there are 15,000 to 100,000 southern megaliths in the Korean Peninsula.[19][20] Typical estimates hover around the 30,000 mark for the entire peninsula, which in itself constitutes some 40% of all dolmens worldwide (see Dolmen).

East Asia[edit]

Northern style[edit]

Northeast Asian megalithic traditions originated in northeast China, in particular the Liao River basin.[21][22] The practice of erecting megalithic burials spread quickly from the Liao River Basin and into the Korean Peninsula, where the structure of megaliths is geographically and chronologically distinct. The earliest megalithic burials are called "northern" or "table-style" because they feature an above-ground burial chamber formed by heavy stone slabs that form a rectangular cist.[23] An oversized capstone is placed over the stone slab burial chamber, giving the appearance of a table-top. These megalithic burials date to the early part of the Mumun pottery period (c. 1500–850 BC) and are distributed, with a few exceptions, north of the Han River. Few northern-style megaliths in northeast China contain grave goods such as Liaoning bronze daggers, prompting some archaeologists to interpret the burials as the graves of chiefs or preeminent individuals.[24] However, whether a result of grave-robbery or intentional mortuary behaviour, most northern megaliths contain no grave goods.

Southern style[edit]

Southern-style megalithic burials are distributed in the southern Korean Peninsula. It is thought that most of them date to the latter part of the Early Mumun or to the Middle Mumun Period.[23][24] Southern-style megaliths are typically smaller in scale than northern megaliths. The interment area of southern megaliths has an underground burial chamber made of earth or lined with thin stone slabs. A massive capstone is placed over the interment area and is supported by smaller propping stones. Most of the megalithic burials on the Korean Peninsula are of the southern type.

As with northern megaliths, southern examples contain few, if any, artifacts. However, a small number of megalithic burials contain fine red-burnished pottery, bronze daggers, polished groundstone daggers, and greenstone ornaments. Southern megalithic burials are often found in groups, spread out in lines that are parallel with the direction of streams. Megalithic cemeteries contain burials that are linked together by low stone platforms made from large river cobbles. Broken red-burnished pottery and charred wood found on these platforms has led archaeologists to hypothesize that these platform were sometimes used for ceremonies and rituals.[25] The capstones of many southern megaliths have 'cup-marks' carvings. A small number of capstones have human and dagger representations.

Capstone style[edit]

These megaliths are distinguished from other types by the presence of a burial shaft, sometimes up to 4 m in depth, which is lined with large cobbles.[26] A large capstone is placed over the burial shaft without propping stones. Capstone-style megaliths are the most monumental type in the Korean Peninsula, and they are primarily distributed near or on the south coast of Korea. It seems that most of these burials date to the latter part of the Middle Mumun (c. 700–550 BC), and they may have been built into the early part of the Late Mumun. An example is found near modern Changwon at Deokcheon-ni, where a small cemetery contained a capstone burial (No. 1) with a massive, rectangularly shaped, stone and earthen platform. Archaeologists were not able to recover the entire feature, but the low platform was at least 56×18 m in size.

Southeast Asia[edit]

Living megalith culture of Indonesia[edit]

The Indonesian archipelago is the host of Austronesian megalith cultures both past and present. Living megalith cultures can be found on Nias, an isolated island off the western coast of North Sumatra, the Batak people in the interior of North Sumatra, on Sumba island in East Nusa Tenggara and also Toraja people from the interior of South Sulawesi. These megalith cultures remained preserved, isolated and undisturbed well into the late 19th century.[citation needed]

Several megalith sites and structures are also found across Indonesia. Menhirs, dolmens, stone tables, ancestral stone statues, and step pyramid structure called Punden Berundak were discovered in various sites in Java, Sumatra, Sulawesi, and the Lesser Sunda Islands.

The Punden step pyramid and menhir can be found in Pagguyangan near Cisolok.[27] The Cipari megalith site also in West Java displays monoliths, stone terraces, and sarcophagi.[28][29] The basic design of later Hindu-Buddhist temples structure in Java after the adoption of Hinduism and Buddhism by the native population has the punden step pyramid concept underlying.[30] The 8th century Borobudur and 15th-century Candi Sukuh, for example, featured the step-pyramid structure.[30][31]

Lore Lindu National Park in Central Sulawesi houses ancient megalith relics such as ancestral stone statues, mostly located in the Bada, Besoa and Napu valleys.[32]

South Asia[edit]

Megaliths in South Asia are dated before 3000 BC, with recent findings dated back to 5000 BC in southern India.[33] Megaliths are found in almost all parts of the South Asia and there is also a broad time evolution with the megaliths in central India and upper Indus valley where oldest Megaliths are also found, while those in the east are of much later date.[34][35] A large fraction of these are assumed to be associated with burial or post burial rituals including memorials for those whose remains may or may not be available. The case-example is that of Brahmagiri, which was excavated by Wheeler (1975) and helped establish the culturesequence in south Indian prehistory. However, there is another distinct class of megaliths that do not seem to be associated with burials.[36]

In South Asia, megaliths of all kinds are noted, these vary from Menhirs, Rock-cut burial, chamber tomb, dolmens, stone alignment, stone circles and anthropomorphic figures. These are broadly classified into (potentially overlapping) of two classes (after Moorti, 1994, 2008): Sepulchral (containing remains of the dead) in which memorial stones where mortal remains along with funerary objects are placed and Non-sepulchral including large patterned placement of stones over a wide area, 'non-spepulchral' type is associated with astronomy and cosmology in South Asia and in other parts of the world (Menon and Vahia, 2010).

In context of prehistoric anthropomorphic figures in India, (Rao 1988/1999, Upinder Singh 2008) note that it is unclear what these giant anthromorphs symbolize, they usually occur in association with megalithic monument and are located in a megalithic burial grounds, they may have been connected with ancestor worship.[39][40]

Melanesian megaliths[edit]

Megaliths occur in many parts of Melanesia, mainly in Milne Bay Province, Fiji and Vanuatu. Few excavations has been made and little is known about the structures. The megalith tomb Otuyam at Kiriwina has been dated to be approximately 2000 years old which indicates that megaliths are an old custom in Melanesia. However very few megaliths have been dated. The constructions have been used for different rituals. For example, tombs, sacrifices and rituals of fecundity. Dance sites exist next to some megaliths. In some places in Melanesia rituals are continued to be held at the sacred megalith sites. The fact that the beliefs are alive is a reason that most excavations have been stopped at the sites.

Micronesian megaliths[edit]

Megalithic structures in Micronesia reach their most developed form on the islands of Pohnpei and Kosrae in the Eastern Caroline Islands. On these two islands there was extensive use of prismatic basalt columns to build upland building complexes such as those at Salapwuk on Pohnpei and Menka on Kosrae. These building sites, remote from the ocean, appear to have been abandoned early. Megalithic building then shifted to constructing networks of artificial islands on the coast that supported a multitude of common, royal and religious structures. Dating of the structures is difficult but the complex at Nan Madol on Pohpei was probably inhabited as early as 800 c.a. probably as an artificial islands with the more elaborate buildings and religious structures added to the site from 1000–1400 c.e. Nan Madol almost certainly served as the economic, government and religious site for a centralized monarchy which is historically named the 'Saudeleurs'. By legend the Saudeleurs were from elsewhere, possibly in the south or west but no specific origin has ever been established. Nan Madol lost prominence and was later abandoned after the overthrow of the Saudeleur dynasty. The oral history suggests this overthrow was by a group of warriors from Kosrae. The megalithic site at Lelu on the island of Kosrae, based on dating studies and oral history, rose to prominence about 1400 c.e. corresponding roughly with the fall of Nan Madol and endured for the next three hundred years or so. It was largely abandoned by the time of European contact. The architecture at these Micronesian sites is characteristic and has little in common with other megalithic sites. Prismatic basalt columns were brought from a great distance to the artificial islands and the rock was stacked in a layers of stretchers and runners filled in the center with coral debris. This structure allowed creation of walls up to 10 meters in height with great durability. The presence of step pyramids in the south western corner of Nan Madol as well as in Lelu suggests some Melanesian influence but other structures such as the royal residence, the religious structures and common areas as well as the elaborate interconnecting system of canals has no parallel elsewhere in the Pacific region.

Modern theories[edit]

Megaliths were used for a variety of purposes ranging from serving as boundary markers of territory, to a reminder of past events, and to being part of the society's religion.[41] Common motifs including crooks and axes seem to be symbols of political power, much as the crook was a symbol of Egyptian pharaohs. Amongst the indigenous peoples of India, Malaysia, Polynesia, North Africa, North America, and South America, the worship of these stones, or the use of these stones to symbolize a spirit or deity, is a possibility.[42] In the early 20th century, some scholars believed that all megaliths belonged to one global "Megalithic culture"[43] (hyperdiffusionism, e. g. ‘the Manchester school’,[44] by Grafton Elliot Smith and William James Perry), but this has long been disproved by modern dating methods.[citation needed] Nor is it believed any longer that there was a pan-European megalithic culture, although regional cultures existed, even within such a small areas as the British Isles. The archaeologist Euan Mackie wrote "Likewise it cannot be doubted that important regional cultures existed in the Neolithic period and can be defined by different kinds of stone circles and local pottery styles (Ruggles & Barclay 2000: figure 1). No-one has ever been rash enough to claim a nationwide unity of all aspects of Neolithic archaeology!"[45]

Types of megalithic structure[edit]

The types of megalithic structure can be divided into two categories, the "polylithic type" and the "monolithic type."[46] Different megalithic structures include:


  • Ale's Stones at Kåseberga, around ten kilometres south east of Ystad, Sweden

Standing stone in Amman, Jordan.
Construction of a megalith grave
Dolmen of Monte Bubbonia (Sicily)
Tumulus of Kercado, near Carnac. Smaller but older structure in the area. (Part of the Cairn is visible)
Representations of a dagger (right) and two human figures, one of which is kneeling (left), carved into the capstone of Megalithic Burial No. 5, Orim-dong, Yeosu, Korea.
People on Nias Island in Indonesia move a megalith, c. 1915. Digitally restored.
Megalithic dolmen in Marayoor, India.
Anthropomorphic megalithic figure from Kumathi, India.

AEIA. see MegawJ.V.S., 1970.

AtkinsonR. J. C. and PiggottS., 1955. ‘The Torrs Chamfrein’, Arch., 96, 197–235.

BrailsfordJ. W., 1975. Early Celtic Masterpieces from Britain in the British Museum. British Museum Publications, London.

Catalogue Troyes, 1898. Musées de Troyes, Bronzes: Catalogue descriptif et raisonné. Troyes.

ClarkeR. R. and DolleyR. H. M., 1954. ‘The Early Iron Age Treasure from Snettisham, Norfolk’, PPS, 20, 27–86.

ClarkeR. R. and HawkesC. F. C., 1955. ‘An iron anthropoid sword from Shouldham, Norfolk, with related continental and British weapons’, PPS, 21, 198–227.

DuignanM., 1976. ‘The Turoe stone: its place in insular La Tène art’. In DuvalP.-M. and HawkesC. F. C. (ed.), Celtic Art in Ancient Europe: Five protohistoric centuries, 201–17. Seminar Press, London and New York.

DuvalP.-M., 1971. ‘Lesstyles de l'art celtique occidental. Terminologie et chronologie’, Actes du VIIIe Congres Int. des Sci. Prehist. et Protohist (Prague), 2, 812–7.

DuvalP.-M., 1973. ‘L'ornament de char de Brentford (Middlesex)’. Centre de Recherches d'Histoire et de Philologie IV: III, Hautes études du monde Gréco-Romain 5, 1–10 = Recherches d'archéologie Celtique et Gallo-Romain.

DuvalP.-M., 1974. ‘Deux éléments fondamentaux du Premier style celtique’, Études Celtiques, 14, 7–19.

ECA. see Jacobsthal, p. 1944.

(Lady)FoxAileen, and PollardSheila H., 1973. ‘A decorated bronze mirror from an Iron Age settlement at Holcombe, Devon’, Ant. J., 53, 16–41.

(Sir)FoxCyril, 1947. A find of the Early Iron Age from Llyn-Cerrig-Bach, Anglesey. Nat. Mus. Wales, Cardiff.

(Sir)FoxCyril, 1958. Pattern and Purpose: a survey of Early Celtic art in Britain. Nat. Mus. Wales, Cardiff.

FreyO.-H., 1955. ‘Eine etruskische Bronzeschnabelkanne’, Au musée de Besancon I = Ann. Litt. de l'Univ. de Basançon, 2e série, II, 1 (Arch. 2).

FreyO.-H., 1971. ‘Die Goldschale von Schwarzenbach’, Hamburger Beitr. z. Arch., 1:2, 85–100.

FreyO.-H., 1974. ‘Akanthusornamentik in der keltischen Kunst’, Hamburger Beitr. z. Arch., 4, 141–57.

FreyO.-H., 1976. ‘Du Premier Style au Style de Waldalgesheim’. In DuvalP.-M. and HawkesC. F. C. (eds.), Celtic Art in Ancient Europe: Five protohistoric centuries, 141–63. Seminar Press, London and New York.

FreyO.-H. and SchwappachF., 1973. ‘Studies in Early Celtic design’, World Arch., 4:3, 339–56.

GabrovecS., 1966. ‘Srednjelatensko oldobje v Sloveniji’, Arheološki Vestnik, 17, 33–106.

HaffnerA., 1974. ‘Zum Ende der Latènezeit im Mittelrheingebiet unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Trierer Landes’, Arch. Korrespondenzbl., 4, 59–72.

HardingD. W., 1974. The Iron Age in Lowland. Britain. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London and Boston.

JacobsthalP., 1927. Ornamente griechischer Vasen. Walter de Gruyter, Leipzig and Berlin.

JacobsthalP., 1941a. ‘Imagery in Early Celtic Art’, Proc. British Acad., 27, 301–20.

JacobsthalP., 1941b. ‘Kelten in Thrakien’, Epitymbion Chrestou Tsounta., 391–400Athens.

JacobsthalP., 1944. Early Celtic Art. Clarendon Press, Oxford (reprint with corrections 1969).

JoffroyR., 1969. ‘Le torque de Mailly-le-Camp (Aube)’, Mon. Piot, 56, 45–59.

JopeE. M., 1954. ‘An Iron Age decorated sword-scabbard from the River Bann at Toome’, UJA, 17, 81–91.

JopeE. M., (n.d.) 1958. ‘The beginnings of La Tène ornamental style in the British Isles’. In FrereS. S. (ed.), Problems of the Iron Age in Southern Britain = Inst. of Arch., Univ. of London, Occ. Papers 11, 69–83.

JopeE. M., 1971. ‘The Witham Shield’. In de G. SievekingG. (ed.), Prehistoric and Roman Studies = British Mus. Quarterly, 35, 61–9.

JopeE. M., 1976. ‘The Wandsworth mask shield and its European sources of inspiration’. In DuvalP.-M. and HawkesC. F. C. (eds.), Celtic Art in Ancient Europe: Five protohistoric centuries, 167–84. Seminar Press, London and New York.

Klindt-JensenO., 1953. ‘Bronzekedelen fra Brå’, Jysk Arkaeologisk Selskabs skr., III. Aarhus.

KrämerW., 1961. ‘Keltische Hohlbuckelringe vom Isthmus von Korinth’, Germania, 39, 32–42.

LabrousseM., 1974. ‘Circonscriptions des antiquités historiques: Midi-Pyrénées’, Gallia, 32, 453–500.

LoweryP. R. and SavageR. D. A., 1976. ‘Celtic design with compasses as seen on the Holcombe mirror’. In DuvalP.-M. and HawkesC. F. C. (eds.), Celtic Art in Ancient Europe: Five protohistoric centuries, 219–31. Seminar Press, London and New York.

LoweryP. R., SavageR. D. A. and WilkinsR. L., 1976. ‘A technical study of the designs on the British mirror series’, Arch., 105, 100–26.

MacGregorMorna, 1976. Early Celtic art in North Britain. Leicester U.P.

MaierF., 1973. ‘Keltische Altertümer in Griechenland’, Germania, 51:2, 459–77.

MegawJ. V. S., 1965–1966. ‘Two La Tène finger rings in the Victoria and Albert Museum, London: an essay on the human face and Early Celtic Art’, Praehist. Zeitschr., 43–4, 96–166.

MegawJ. V. S., 1968. ‘Two finds of the Celtic Iron Age from Dodona’. JazdzewskiK. (ed.), Liber Josepho Kostrzewski octogenario a veneratoribus dicatus, 186–93. Warsaw.

MegawJ. V. S., 1970. Art of the European Iron Age: a study of the elusive image. Adams and Dart, Bath.

MegawJ. V. S., 1972. ‘Style and style-analysis in continental Early La Tène art’, World Archaeology3, 276–92.

MegawJ. V. S., in press. ‘The decorated sword-scabbards of iron from Cernon-sur-Coole, Marne and Drňa, Rimavská Sobota, Slovakia’, Hamburger Beitr. z. Arch., 3:2.

MegawJ. V. S. and MerrifieldR., 1970. ‘The Dowgate plaque’, Arch. J., 126, 154–9.

de NavarroJ. M., 1972. The Finds from the Site of La Tène, I: Scabbards and the swords found in them. Pt. 1–2. O.U.P. for British Academy, London.

OliverA.Jr., 1968. ‘The reconstruction of two Apulian tomb groups’, Antike Kunst, Beiht. 5.

PaničS., 1966. ‘Keltske najdbe v podravju’, Arheološki Vestnik, 17, 271–336.

PiggottS., 1950. ‘Swords and scabbards of the British Early Iron Age’, PPS, 16, 1–28.

PP. See (Sir)FoxCyril, 1958.

RilliotM., 1975. ‘Epée de la Tène I, à Meroux, (Territoire de Belfort)’, Rev. Arch. de l'Est et du Centre-Est, 26, 443–4.

SavoryH. N., 1964. ‘A new hoard of La Tène metalwork from Merionethshire’, Bull. Board of Celtic Studies, 20, 449–75.

SavoryH. N., 1966. ‘Further notes on the Tal-y-Llyn (Mer.) hoard of La Tène metalwork’, Bull. Board of Celtic Studies, 22, 88–103.

SavoryH. N., 1976. ‘The La Tène Shield in Wales’. In DuvalP.-M. and HawkesC. F. C. (eds.), Celtic Art in Europe: Fiveprotohistoric centuries, 185–99. Seminar Press, London and New York.

SchaaffU., 1972. ‘Ein keltischer Hohlbuckelring aus Kleinasien’, Germania, 50, 94–7.

SchwappachF., 1969. ‘Stempelverzierte Keramik von Armorica’. In FreyO.-H. (ed.) Marburger Beiträge zur Archäologie der Kelten: Festschr. W. Dehn = Fundber. aus Hessen, Beiht. 1, 213–87.

SchwappachF., 1973. ‘Frühkeltisches Ornament zwischen Marne, Rhein und Moldau’, Bonner Jahrb., 173, 53–111.

SchwappachF., 1974a. ‘Ostkeltisches und westkeltisches Ornament auf einem älterlatènezeitlichen Gürtelhaken von Mühlacker, Kreis Vaihingen’, Fundber. aus Baden-Württemberg1, 337–72.

SchwappachF., 1974b. ‘Zu einigen Tierdarstellungen der Frühlatenekunst’, Hamburger Beitr. z.Arch., 4, 103–40.

SchwappachF., 1976. ‘L'art ornamental du “Premier style” celtique’. In DuvalP.-M. and HawkesC. F. C. (eds.), Celtic Art in Ancient Europe: Five protohistoric centuries, 61–110. Seminar Press, London and New York.

SteadI. M., 1971. ‘The reconstruction of Iron Age buckets from Aylesford and Baldock’. In de G. SievekingG. (ed.), Prehistoric and Roman Studies = British Mus. Quarterly, 35, 250–282.

SzabóM., 1971. ‘Une fibule celtique à Délos’, Bull. de Correspondence Hellénique, 95, 503–14.

SzabóM., 1973. ‘Éléments régionaux dans l'art des Celtes orientaux’, Actes du quatrième congrès internat. d'Études Celtiques, Rennes 1971 = Études Celtiques, 13:2, 750–74.

SzabóM. and PetresÉva., 1974. A keleti Kelta muvészet—Eastern Celtic art. István Király Múzeum, Székesfehérvár.

ThillJ., 1967. ‘Die Metallgegenstände aus vier spätlatenèzeitlichen Brandgräbern bei Goeblingen-Nospelt’, Hémecht, 18, 87–98.

TodorovićJ., 1968. Kelti u jugoistočnoj Evropi = Dissertationes 7. Beograd.

VaragnacA., 1956. In VaragnacA., FabreG. et al. , L'art gaulois, 217–75. Zodiaque, La Pierre-qui-Vire (Yonne).

WaltersH. B., 1893. Catalogue of the Greek and Etruscan Vases, 2. British Museum, London.

WernerJ., 1953. ‘Keltisches Pferdegeschirr der Spátlatènezeit’, Saalburg-Jahrb., 12, 42–52.

WernerJ., 1962–1963. ‘Aquileia-Velem-Hrazany’, Alt-Thüringen, 6, 428–35.

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *