Buy College English Essays
Your browser is not secure
You're seeing this page because your web browser tried to connect to Warwick's website with insecure settings. Please upgrade your web browser.
The TLS 1.0 encryption protocol is disabled across the University's web services. Disabling TLS 1.0 prevents it from being used to access Warwick websites via an insecure web browser or application. We've made this change to keep the University's websites safe and secure.
What do I need to do?
When accessing websites using a web browser, ensure you use the latest available version of the browser – whether that is Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Safari or another browser. Using the latest version keeps you safe online because you're using the most up-to-date security settings.
Why is this happening?
Although TLS 1.0, when configured properly, has no known security vulnerabilities, newer protocols are designed better to address the potential for new vulnerabilities.
The PCI Data Security Standard 3.1 recommends disabling “early TLS”:
“SSL and early TLS are not considered strong cryptography and cannot be used as a security control after June 30, 2016 [without a mitigation strategy for disabling it before June 2018].
The best response is to disable SSL entirely and migrate to a more modern encryption protocol, which at the time of publication is a minimum of TLS v1.1, although entities are strongly encouraged to consider TLS v1.2.”
We need to be PCI-compliant to take online payments at the University. It is not sufficient to merely disable TLS 1.0 on our transaction tracking system as the requirement extends to any system that initiates a payment, including car parking, printer credits, the Warwick website, etc.
You’ve surely seen them — online advertisements offering to write an essay for you in exchange for cash. Essays about Dante, Shakespeare, Lincoln, even personal narratives about yourself even though the author has never met you. Can’t write an essay to get into college? Medical school? You can buy one. Or two or three.
Setting aside the moral and ethical issues attached to essay buying, another question looms: Are they any good? Connor Gorry, an enterprising teen at The CB Talon, the student newspaper of the private Christian Brothers High School in Sacramento, California, hired a service on Twitter to write an essay and then had teachers grade it. The results were interesting. Here’s a shortened version of his original piece, which first appeared in the Talon and which I am publishing with permission.
By Connor Gorry
It all started when a fellow senior, who shall remain anonymous,sarcastically tweeted that he would “Pay someone to write [his college] essay” for him.
While the statement was seen as a joke by his friends and followers, some shrewd business-people online seemed to take the innocent complaint as a legitimate demand. Within seconds of the posting, a slew of automated Twitter accounts had replied, each excitedly offering to pen his essay for him.
But could it really be that simple? Could a Tweet, a few dollars, and a week’s wait really be the solution to all of a CB student’s problems?
With such promises as a “plagiarism free paper” and a “‘B’ or better” guarantee, it all seemed a little too good to be true.
So, in the name of investigative journalism, I took it upon myself to get to answer the questions: Could an essay bought from an outside source pass the plagiarism test, and how would it stack up against CB teacher’s high expectations? (Hint: not very well.)
So I published my own Tweet (pictured), this time about a completely made-up essay, as bait for the scores of scavenging Twitter-bots. With the unexpected side-effect of terrifying my diligent classmates who thought that we actually had an essay due, it accomplished its goal, and within minutes I had six different services to choose from.
Next, I approached Ms. Marian Shackel and Mr. Tom English, for a prompt for my imaginary paper. Together, they crafted a challenging question about Dante’s Inferno, but one which the so-called “professional writers” should be able to tackle without a problem.
Finally, I pulled a few strings with Talon Adviser Mr. Dave Anderson and the media department and secured funding for the essay, so I would not be forced to pay out of my own pocket.
With a prompt, some funding, and a slew of offers to choose from, I embarked on a journey to assess the merits of purchasing a paper, and uncover the secrets of the black and white market.
From my list of potential suitors, I chose to buy from Academic Writers. (Their branding was irresistible — come on, their Twitter icon is a proud graduating student, clearly symbolizing the success that I would have after using their service.)
Their website home page, which is littered with stock pictures of beaming graduates and well0dressed business people, makes it surprisingly simple to input a number of pages, a due date, a preferred format, and level of “quality” that the essay requires.
After inputting my prompt and preferences, all that was left to do was pay and wait.
To the site’s credit, the process was fairly easy. I even used a first-time coupon code advertised on their home-page, which reduced the price a full 20 percent.
Then, come Sunday, a full three days before the essay was “due,” another surprise: the essay came early!
Lastly, after running the essay through plagiarism screener turnitin.com, I was amazed to find that the essay only had a 6 oercebt similarity index — a stat on par with or even lower than many student written essays, including my own.
So far, my essay purchasing experience was entirely positive.
For a second I thought that maybe, justmaybe, buying an essay could be an efficient, even if amoral, alternative.
Then, I read it.
In the words of Honors American Literature Teacher Ms. Chrys Cassetta, the essay was “tragically bad.” At several points, the poor grammar, abysmal structure, and blatant misinterpretation of the plot of Dante’s Inferno are borderline comical.
But rest assured: even if you, the reader, are completely unfamiliar with the epic poem, you shouldn’t feel too lost– the entire essay is summary anyway.
Some highlights (for lack of a better word) include, but are not limited to…
- Citations without quotes.
- The misspelling of basic words.
- Jumbled sentence structure.
- Major misunderstandings of the poem’s basic plot.
- The absence of a clearly defined thesis.
- Confusion of the words “no” and “know”.
- The constant reference to the character of Virgil as “the Virgil”.
- A notable lack of any form of commentary, whatsoever.
and, perhaps most importantly…
- Hardly a single attempt to address the given prompt.
My personal favorite error comes in the very first sentence, which references the “quartet” works of the Divine Comedy — one of literature’s finest trilogies.
Simply put, the essay is not what was paid for. Actually, it wasn’t even close.
Ms. Cassetta, who had taught me the previous year, caught on early in her grading process that it was, in fact, not actually my writing. When I informed her after the fact that I had purchased the essay for $35.80, her jaw hit the floor.
“Forty Dollars!” she exclaimed in disbelief, as though to scold me for my poor investment. I, of course, felt obligated to clarify that that was, in fact, after applying the coupon code.
Talon Adviser and Literature instructor Mr. Anderson, who knew from the outset that the essay was purchased online, found reading the paper to be far more entertaining than enlightening.
“Oh look, a citation!”, he enthusiastically pointed out, “…in the — one, two, three, four — fifth paragraph!” He was, of course, left disappointed when he saw that the citation was not actually linked to any actual quote from the text.
Even Mr. Tony Caselli (’97) shredded the essay upon his review.
“I have no idea what the thesis is,” he explains. “At no point in the essay is an argument presented… [it] reads like a simple retelling of The Inferno – a book report.”
While the instructors of the Literature Department collectively lampooned the fraudulent paper for its lack of analysis and commentary, CB’s resident historian and Inferno fanatic Mr. English found just as many problems with its content.
“[Some] specifics would have been helpful,” he calmly complained in the side margin on the first page. His visible frustration with the paper’s misconstrued facts quickly escalated, however. “This is ridiculous!” he wrote towards the end of the third page, “I am ready to scream!”
By far the harshest critique, however, came from Accelerated Freshman and AP Literature and Composition instructor Miss Shackel.
After spending “a good 40 minutes” grading the essay (more than any teacher should have to, and certainly much more than I had asked her to), the annotated paper that I received in return looked for the most part, like this.
“The paper deserves an F,” she said.
But regardless of how many grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, or plot inconsistencies Ms. Shackel seemed to circle with her trademark green pen, no marking could highlight the real problem of the essay: the things that simply weren’t there.
“The essay failed to mention what I consider to be the two cardinal rules for writing at CB,” Miss Shackel writes in her concluding comments, “It provided no detail and no commentary” and “it did not attempt to answer the prompt.”
“It’s just not what we are trying to teach,” she concluded, speaking on behalf of the entire CB Literature department.
From the teachers who graded the essay, it received grades of:
Ms. Cassetta: D-
Mr. Caselli: D-
Mr. English: F
Miss Shackel: F
Each teacher seemed to have their own theory as to where it came from: a computer, a lazy slacker behind a computer screen, a foreign exchange student with little understanding of the English language, and the list goes on. But you don’t have to take my word for it — just look at the grades the essay received: Your writing is better than that of these so-called “professionals,” whoever they may be.
In conclusion, and without even having touched upon the moral aspect of buying a school assignment, the Talon has chosen not to condone the use of online services to write your essays, on economic and academic grounds alone.